Begotten
The primary meaning of this
word in the Old Testament, translated from the Hebrew yawlad, is to bear
young, then in its causative sense to beget (be the cause of). It is also used in the sense of a midwife and
in a detailed sense, to show lineage.
There are many uses of yawlad
in reference to the begetting of children in the Old Testament but the one
of special interest, because of its reference to Messiah the Son of God, is in
Psalm 2:7; “I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou [art] my Son; this day have I
begotten thee.” The declared
decree is in two sections, “Thou art my Son” and “this day have I
begotten thee”.
The first is interesting
because of the etymology of the word ben meaning son. The word ben,
and bath – daughter; are both derived from the verb banah meaning to build, and therefore a son/daughter is one who has
been built and is part of the continuing process of the construction of, i.e.
the family, tribe, nation (or Church).
Being the Son of God, or ‘the only begotten’ Son as the New Testament
further reveals Messiah will build God’s family by empowering men and women to
become sons of God through faith in him (John 1:12).
The New Testament word for build is the Gk. oikodomeo (Matthew 16:18) and means to be a house builder; there it
has the idea of constructing an immaterial (a spiritual) building, the
Church. The Church is said to be the
body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:27) “…and
members in particular”. In Romans
8:10-17 Paul shows that those who are ‘born again’ have the testimony of the Spirit
within that they are the sons - the children of God. This family relationship is because of Christ
being in you and conversely of you being in Christ (Romans 8). We are ‘born again’ into the family of God through
faith in Jesus Christ - God’s only begotten Son; God’s builder of the
Church.
This
day have I begotten thee:
There is no clear idea in
Psalm 2 as to when this day was or would be: The heathen have raged since time
immemorial and people have imagined they can do without God from the very
beginning, yet although individual nations have been judged and even destroyed,
the wrath and sore displeasure of vs.5 is to be upon the heathen,
suggesting a world wide desolation, and on the people suggesting national
judgement on Israel. Taking all things
into consideration it would appear to be the language used for the future day
of wrath as described in Zephaniah 1:15; “That day is a day of wrath, a day
of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness
and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness”.
The ISBE describes this day
thus:
It denotes the consummation
of the kingdom of God and the absolute cessation of all attacks upon it (Isaiah
2:12; Isaiah 13:6, Isaiah 13:9; Isaiah 34:8; Ezekiel 13:5; Ezekiel 30:3; Joel
1:15; Joel 2:11; Amos 5:18; Zephaniah 1:14; Zechariah 14:1) It is a “day of
visitation” (Isaiah 10:3), a day “of the wrath of Yahweh” (Ezekiel 7:19), a
“great day of Yahweh” (Zephaniah 1:14). The entire conception in the Old
Testament is dark and foreboding.
It is a day of future worldwide and catastrophic judgement and if this is the case then the day that God’s Son
was begotten (vs.7) might, from this passage alone, be any day from the
beginning of days to that final day of wrath, unless the Lord reveals the truth of the matter somewhere else.
When we turn to the New Testament the truth is soon established, for as
the letter to the Hebrews shows, the Son through whom God has spoken in those
last days was no other than Jesus who is called Christ (the anointed). Who is not only the Son (Hebrews 1:2, 5, 8)
but is very God himself (1:8, 9, 10, 12); not only God himself, but our
sacrifice (2:9, 14) and our High Priest (2:17, 3:1) and the one through whom we
are able to obtain mercy and find grace in the times of our need (4:14-16).
In Acts 13:30-33, Paul speaks of God’s past promises being fulfilled in the resurrection of Christ, and quotes this passage from Psalm 2 as a
proof text. Paul states that the
resurrection of Christ was the fulfilment of this passage from Psalm 2.
“God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up
Jesus again; as it is also written
in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.”
Quoting Alfred Barnes; “This interpretation of an inspired apostle fixes
the meaning of this passage in the psalm, and proves that it is not there used
with reference to the doctrine of eternal generation, or to his incarnation,
but that he is called his Son because he was raised from the dead.”
When we look at this Psalm from it’s beginning, we see the prophetic
accuracy of the psalmist in portraying the hatred, abuse and rejection that the
authorities (both Jewish and Gentile) and the people, would hold for Jesus of
Nazareth and the God whom he came to represent.
Yet the LORD who sitteth in the heavens is unmoved and states that even
against such hatred and rejection, “Yet
have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion”.
It was the Lord who gave the Apostle Peter the words of fulfilment; “…let
all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus,
whom (they had) crucified, both Lord and
Christ” (Acts 2:22-36). It was
after the rage, the vanity and the counsel of ungodly men had spent itself against
the LORD’S anointed, that Jesus whom they had crucified was made both Lord and
Christ. It was then that the fulfilment
of this passage in Psalm 2 occurred.
This passage in Psalm 2 refers therefore, “not to his eternal generation
or his incarnation, but to something succeeding his death; that is, to his
resurrection, and his establishment as King at the right hand of God.”
Romans 1:8 states Christ was “declared
to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead”.
The phrase “firstborn from the dead” is in keeping with this whole
concept. Colossians 1:18 tells us that
Christ is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, alluding to a newness of
life due to the resurrection. It is also
the life that the believer shares (Romans 6:4).
Revelation 1:5 describes Jesus Christ as “the first begotten of the
dead…” and it is in this context that he is called a Son.
In Luke 1:35 the child born to Mary would be called the “Son of God”.
Mary was overshadowed (became pregnant) by the supervening power of the Holy
Spirit, and “that holy thing which shall
be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.” This might suggest that Jesus was the Son of
God by reason of his incarnation, but it is in the future tense (shall be) and
therefore does not conflict with Paul’s statement.
In this psalm however, Paul says that the Psalmist
was prophesying the resurrection and its consequences.
“God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath
raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my
Son, this day have I begotten thee.”
No comments:
Post a Comment